Education – Why Some Children Must Be Left Behind

education
Not all children can be A students

When countries are measured for “standard of life”, education is consistently one of the main criteria used in establishing the rating. Specifically, the per capita number of people with higher education is used to determine how educated a population is. One of the main tenets of our liberal, egalitarian order is that everyone is entitled to an education to at least a high school graduation level and often even further thanks to government programs and loans.

American children are taught growing up that they can be anything, even President of the United States. Nothing is further from the case. Not all children are created equal as even children understand. Some naturally excel at sports, others at music. Yet for some reason American education policy refuses to accept the reality that some children are simply better at the core subjects in school than others and wishes to paper over these obvious differences. The classic example of this hubris is the No Child Left Behind Act co-authored by Democratic Rep. George Miller of California and Democratic U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy.

Charles Murray takes issue with this rejection of reality in: The Bell Curve Tolls For Thee. Here’s an excerpt:

In all areas of academic ability, half of the children are below average. This fact has implications for education and public policy, and yet it’s something most politicians and public intellectuals would rather not talk about. It amounts to educational romanticism. At its heart is a glib presumption that every child can be anything he or she wants to be if only the schools do their job properly. No one really believes it, but we approach education’s problems as if we did. We are phobic about saying out loud that children differ in their ability to learn the things schools teach. Not only do we hate to say it, we get angry with people who do.

click here to read the rest of the article


Bookmark and Share

Advertisements

One Response to Education – Why Some Children Must Be Left Behind

  1. BlueFakes says:

    It’s about time someone else noticed this. The “No Child Left Behind” policy is completely ineffectual. I raised my son and daughter both the same, and I feel I treat them the same, but daughter just finds learning new things easier. I’m not sure if it’s a matter of personality, gender, genetics, or what, but the message doesn’t have to be that they are unequal or my son is any less than my daughter simply because it takes him longer to learn. The message should be “All people are created differently.” But necessarily unequal, and to be honest, sometimes they are. Life is just unfair like that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: